![]() |
| Vienna (2011) oil on canvas, 20 x 16 inches |
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Ab-Ex with Clyfford Still
The Abstract Expressionists were never a unified voice, and characterizations are invariably fluid, as each artist developed one or more signature styles. Painters sought to avoid predefined limits and to express the greatest possible range of meaning through their own visual language ... by the mid-1940s Clyfford Still was developing his signature style of colour fields that join in jagged interfaces.
- Image and text from The Art Museum (2011) Phaidon Press, p. 381
![]() |
| Clyfford Still "1957-D No.1" (1957) oil on canvas, 9 ft 5 in x 13 ft 3 in |
Friday, January 13, 2012
Ab-Ex with Lee Krasner
This canvas presents a series of tightly packed forms and enclosed shapes, characteristic of the work of Krasner (1908-84). An invigorating tension exists between the looseness of her expressive brushwork and rhythm, and the underlying sense of order and direction.
- Image and text from The Art Museum (2011) Phaidon Press, p. 381
![]() | |
| Lee Krasner -Another Storm (1963) oil on canvas, 7 ft 10 in x 14 ft 8 in |
Ab-Ex with Joan Mitchell
- Image and text from The Art Museum (2011) Phaidon Press, p. 381 ![]() | |||
| Joan Mitchell - Salut Tom (1979), oil on canvas, about 9 ft by 6 ft 6 in |
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
New Body of Work (2011-present)
Since grad school, I have watched my work veer towards the non-objective. I can't explain it in words just yet, but Georges Braque (1882-1963) can. In 1955, he said:
"I have made a very great discovery - I no longer believe in anything. Objects do not exist for me except if there is a harmonious relationship between them, and also between them and myself. When one arrives at this harmony, one arrives at a space of intellectual nothingness. In this way, everything becomes possible, everything becomes right, and life is an eternal revelation. That is true poetry."
- quote from The Art Museum (2011) Phaidon Press, p. 372
| Photo taken inside studio on 1-11-2011 |
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Four new paintings (2011)
Saturday, September 17, 2011
Reading with Joan Mitchell
There is no quiet in this town. No quiet in this house. No quiet in my head. There must be a solution, a way to silence this noise. I would move to the county if I could. Almost daily I daydream about waking up to the sound of nothing. No trucks. No cars. No crowds of humans walking by. No cell phones. The only sound I want to hear is an unplugged one.
Fall is here and for the first time in four years, I am not taking a class at Temple University. Simply put, I finally graduated. However, I still have library privileges, something I plan to abuse as long as I stay in Philly. Campus was mad today. Had to pay $14 for parking. Was pissed about that, but then I quickly celebrated the fact that I am no longer committed to commuting to campus. I traded in thirty pounds of books and left with forty. I rid myself of the books with words that I used to write my master’s paper. I wanted large picture books. I am teaching a small class of adults to paint in acrylics so I grabbed books on Johannes Itten, Josef Albers, and Hans Hofmann. Then another tome caught my eye, Joan Mitchell: Lady Painter. The book was brand new, 2011, wrapped in a calm ultramarine blue cover. I would be the first reader. I got goosebumps.
![]() |
| Joan Mitchell (1925 - 1992) UNTITLED 1957, Oil on canvas, 80 x 57 inches |
| Lee Bontecou (b. 1931) UNTITLED 1962, Welded steel, epoxy, canvas, fabric, saw blade, and wire, 68 x 72 x 30 inches |
The day I truly discovered Joan Mitchell was September 21st, 2008. I say truly, because I am sure I knew her name from passing but I had never seen her work in person. Although I see many paintings in books, the experience of seeing a painting in person is a decisive moment. Cezanne and Matisse amaze me in books, but in person, I feel less. Van Gogh is okay in books but in person, he rocks. Painting is textural. It is not illustration. It is not print. It is not meant to be experienced on a computer screen. Painting is visceral. Painting is blood and guts. I was in New York City at the Jewish Museum wandering the exhibit, Action/Abstraction: Pollock, de Kooning, and American Art, 1940-1976 (NYTimes Photos). Joan Mitchell is no exception when it comes to mansize paintings. I stood immobilized between her aggressive brushstrokes from 1957 and Lee Bontecou’s 1962 sewn metal sculpture. They faced each other and I stood between them, feeling, "This is it. These are my ladies."
A few pages into my new book, I felt assured of my selection:
Having come of age as an artist on New York’s Tenth Street in the 1950s and reveled in its marvelous “community of feeling,” Joan Mitchell has been written into the mythology of Abstract Expressionism. She knocked back beers with the boys at the Cedar Tavern, caroused in the Hamptons, hung out with hip cats at the Five Spot, and felt the pain and thrill of belonging, or nearly, to the little band of rebels operating below Fourteenth Street … Yet, despite her personal and artistic self-identification with Abstract Expressionism, Joan’s art confounds textbook classification. It has to do, she said, with memories of her feelings – feelings about “love and death and all that crap” – ensnared in lakes, trees, rivers, clouds, sunflowers, bridges and so on.
I was like, “Oh crap, that is what I do,” and then I laughed because Joan said crap.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











